- Room 1807, Unit 9, Building 2, Shangxing Commercial Street, Shangde Road, Shangxing Community, Xinqiao Subdistrict, Bao'an District, Shenzhen City, China




Contact Us
Our team is on stand by, waiting toassist you.
Videos
A large collection of educational videos and tutorials.
About Us
Learn about our company, leadership, and mission totransform manufacturing.
Privacy Policy
Applies to all personal information collected through and/or processed in connection.

Aerospace & UAV
WJ Prototypes is your 3D manufacturing partner from prototype to large scale production.
Consumer Electronics
New Product Introduction Solutions for Consumer Electronics.

Robotics & Automation
Need some assistance bringing your robotic device or parts from the sketch-board to reality?
Medical Devices
The medical industry needs high quality, dependable and safe parts and products.
Automotive
New Product Introduction Solutions for Automotive
Industrial Machinery
The main purpose of industrial prototyping is to take the product from drawings into the real world.


FDM materials are thermoplastics, supplied as filament, that a printer melts and extrudes layer by layer. They run from PLA and ABS to PETG, nylon, polycarbonate and high-performance polymers such as ULTEM. The right one depends on what the part must survive: heat, load, chemicals, static, sterilization or a flame test. It does not depend on which plastic is cheapest or most familiar. This guide groups the main FDM materials by job, shows where each one fails, and lists the checks to run before you order parts.
Fused deposition modeling builds objects from successive layers of extruded thermoplastic filament. The melted plastic cools and solidifies into a functional part. Nothing is cut away, which is the main difference from machining.
The same source separates two worlds. Desktop printers mostly run low-cost filament. Industrial FDM systems use thermoplastics such as ABS, PC, nylon and high-performance polymers like PEI/ULTEM and PEKK, selected for strength, chemical and heat resistance, and in some cases biocompatibility. When someone says “FDM material” they can mean either, and that gap explains most disappointing prototypes: a part tested in hobby-grade PLA says little about what an engineering-grade polymer will do.
Only thermoplastics work, because they soften when heated and harden again when cooled. Thermosets do not melt, so they belong to other processes such as vacuum casting.

It helps to sort the range into three tiers. Names and exact grades vary by manufacturer, so treat this as a map, not a catalog.
| Tier | Typical materials | Best for | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | PLA, ABS, PETG | Concept models, fit checks, jigs for light use | Heat softening (PLA), warping (ABS), creep under sustained load |
| Engineering | Nylon (PA), PC, PC-ABS, ASA | Functional prototypes, enclosures, brackets, snap fits | Moisture uptake (nylon), outdoor aging if you choose the wrong grade |
| High-performance | PEI (ULTEM), PEKK, PPSF and similar | Aerospace, medical, under-hood and chemical-exposed parts | Cost, lead time, and the need for controlled print conditions |
PLA prints easily and holds fine detail. It is a good choice for visual models and early fit checks. It softens at modest temperatures, so it is a poor pick for anything that sits in a hot car, a motor bay or a sunny window.
ABS is tougher and handles more heat than PLA. It is the traditional workhorse for housings and mock-ups. It shrinks as it cools, which is why large, flat ABS parts can warp if the print chamber is not controlled.
PETG sits between the two: easier to print than ABS, tougher than PLA, with decent chemical resistance. It is popular for guards, covers and fluid-contact prototypes. The “can I drink from a PETG cup” question comes up often. The honest answer is that the raw resin may be food-grade while a printed part is a different matter: layer lines trap bacteria, and additives or colorants may not be rated for food contact. Do not use a printed part for food or drink unless the supplier documents it for that use.

Nylon offers toughness and wear resistance, which makes it a natural fit for living hinges, gears, clips and bushings. It absorbs moisture from the air, and that changes stiffness and dimensions. Store it dry and test parts in the humidity they will actually see.
Polycarbonate (PC) gives high impact strength and higher heat resistance than ABS. It suits functional housings and fixtures that take hits.
PC-ABS blends the two, trading a little heat resistance for easier printing and good impact behavior.
ASA is the usual answer when a part lives outdoors. It resembles ABS but is designed to resist UV exposure, so it suits enclosures, vents and trim that will sit in sunlight.
PEI grades such as ULTEM 9085 are the reference materials for demanding FDM work. A research paper on PEI blends describes ULTEM 9085 as the standard PEI grade for advanced FDM applications, and notes that the ULTEM grades are certified for use in the automotive, medical and aerospace fields.
NASA’s engine-component study gives useful numbers. In its testing, FDM-printed ULTEM 9085 kept about 84% of the tensile strength and 64% of the modulus of injection-molded counterparts. Adding 10% chopped carbon fiber to ULTEM 1000 raised tensile strength by 23% and modulus by 38%. Read that as a design rule: even the best printed polymer is weaker than the molded equivalent, and the stiffness loss is larger than the strength loss. Size your walls accordingly.
The fastest way to narrow the list is to write down the three requirements that would make the part fail, then rank materials against those.
Stratasys makes the same point in its guidance: selecting an FDM material is about matching application demands such as strength, flexibility and thermal resistance. For a broader look at how to weigh these trade-offs across processes, our guide on how to select materials walks through the full decision, and the material selection guide for product development teams covers how to run it with a team.
If your shortlist includes machined plastics as well as printed ones, guidance on advanced plastics and polymers shows how the same material families behave when cut rather than extruded.
This is the point engineers most often miss. FDM is process-dependent. UL’s research compared 3D printed plastic samples with injection-molded ones and found significant variation in flammability, ignition and electrical properties. Its conclusion: ratings from traditional molding cannot simply be applied to printed parts. Parts made from the same filament but with different layer thickness, build orientation or raster angle can behave differently.
What this means in practice:
Parts that touch or sit near sensitive electronics, such as trays, fixtures and enclosures, may need to be static-dissipative. Standard filaments are insulators and hold charge. ESD-safe grades are formulated to bleed it off. Our engineer’s guide to ESD-safe materials explains the categories and how to specify them.
Biocompatibility is a property of the finished device, not of the filament. The FDA’s guidance on 3D printing at the point of care treats the whole device life cycle as the thing to control. Sterilization is a clear example: the FDA’s educational page on sterilization methods and additively manufactured devices explains that the method used can change dimensional stability. If your part will be steam-, gamma- or chemically sterilized, test dimensions and mechanical performance after sterilization, and confirm requirements with your regulatory lead before you freeze the material.
Cabin and ducting parts often need flame, smoke and toxicity compliance. High-performance PEI grades are the usual candidates, and NASA’s work shows they can reach flight-relevant structures under controlled conditions. That qualification belongs to the whole controlled process, so a flight part needs the supplier’s process documentation, not just the right resin name. For real part examples, see our roundup of additive manufacturing examples for aerospace engineers.
FDM is the most accessible additive process, but it is not always the best fit. Consider switching when:
FDM remains the right call for large, functional parts, jigs and fixtures, quick design iterations, and parts in engineering thermoplastics that you want in days.
Most material problems we see start before the file reaches us. A team picks PLA for a fit check, then runs the same part in a warm test rig and wonders why it sagged. Or they specify a high-performance polymer because it sounds safe, and pay for properties the part never uses.
Our advice is to choose by failure mode. Tell us what the part must do, and we will suggest the cheapest material that does it. For functional work that usually means an engineering-grade thermoplastic, and for regulated parts it means documenting the material and process together. Because we run FDM beside SLA, SLS, MJF, DMLS, CNC machining and molding, we can say honestly when another process suits your part better. We also work with no minimum order quantity, so one test part is a normal order.
— Nas
If you have a CAD file and a requirement list, upload them for an instant quote on our FDM 3D printing service. Our ISO-certified team and dedicated project managers will confirm the material and specifications with you before production. You can also compare other processes on our 3D printing materials page, or read our guide to FDM materials for engineers sourcing in China.
PLA, ABS and PETG are the most common standard materials. Engineering projects often move to nylon, polycarbonate, PC-ABS and ASA, and demanding applications use PEI (ULTEM) or PEKK. Industrial systems support a wider thermoplastic range than desktop machines.
Not by default. Even when the raw PETG is food-grade, printed layer lines can trap bacteria, and colorants or additives may not be rated for food contact. Use a printed part for food or drink only if the supplier documents the exact material and process for that use.
No. In NASA’s testing, printed ULTEM 9085 kept about 84% of the tensile strength of molded parts and 64% of the modulus. Strength also varies with build orientation, so design the load to run along the layers.
Not without checking. UL found that ratings from injection molding cannot be directly applied to printed parts. Confirm the rating applies to the exact material and print conditions you will use.